Drawing for ZEHA BERLIN

USPTO serial 79013839

ZEHA BERLIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZEHA BERLIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, shorts, dresses, footwear, and headgear, namely, caps and hatsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 30, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 21, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 9, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 8, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 12, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 7, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 5, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance