Drawing for PERSAN

USPTO serial 79013873

PERSAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3181144Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 5, 2006
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERSAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Textile goods, namely, bed and table covers, namely, bedspreads, comforters, bed pads, bed canopies, textile table cloths, bed sheets, bath linen, bed linen, cloth coasters, curtains, bed sheets made of flannel, household linen, shower curtains, curtains made of textile fabrics; fabrics for textile use, namely, chenille fabrics, cheviot fabrics, cotton fabrics, cotton base mixed fabrics, woolen fabrics, curtain fabrics, jute fabrics, knitted fabrics, fiberglass fabrics for textile use, flax fabrics, gauze fabrics, hemp yarn fabrics, polyester fabrics, rayon fabrics, jeans fabrics, silk-based mixed fabrics, hand spun silk fabrics, ticking fabrics, woven fabrics, textile fabric of animal skin imitations, upholstery fabrics, fireproof upholstery fabricsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 18, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 1, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 6, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Oct 6, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 11, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 5, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 31, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 9, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 30, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance