Drawing for Serial No. 79014025

USPTO serial 79014025

Serial No. 79014025

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79014025?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Buttercream; butter; cheese; chocolate nut butter; cream; whipping cream; kephir milk beverage; milk; milk beverages with high milk content; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurtSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 8, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 18, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 14, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 11, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 11, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance