USPTO serial 79014043
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. O'Malley
John J. O'Malley Volpe and Koenig, P.C.30 South 17th StreetDuane Morris Plaza, Suite 1800Philadelphia, PA 19103-4009| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SCIENTIFIC AND ELECTRICAL APPARATUS, INSTRUMENTS AND COMPONENTS, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR CONFIGURATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA, PERFORMING MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS FOR ANALYSIS; DATA LOGGING COMPUTER HARDWARE; DATA STORING COMPUTER HARDWARE; VOLTAGE INPUT COMPUTER HARDWARE; MEASURING COMPUTER HARDWARE; POWER SUPPLY MODULES; DISPLAY SCREENS FOR DATA; USB DATA STORAGE MEDIA; PC MEMORY CARDS, NAMELY, MEMORY CARDS IN THE NATURE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER INTERFACE BOARDS; ELECTRONIC SENSORS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF CURRENT; SIGNAL CONVERTERS AND ADAPTER MODULES; MEASUREMENT BOXES, PLUGS AND JUNCTIONS, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL ADAPTER BOXES FOR ICP SENSORS AND MEASURING CABLES; PERSONAL NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS; COMPUTER KEYBOARDS; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM RECEIVERS; WIRELESS DATA ELECTRONIC TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS FOR THE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA; CABLE ADAPTER BOX; ICP SENSOR ADAPTER MODULES; ALL FOR USE IN VEHICLE TESTING; NAUTICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR CONFIGURATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA, PERFORMING MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS FOR ANALYSIS; DRIVERS FOR SOFTWARE; DATA LOGGING COMPUTER HARDWARE; DATA STORING COMPUTER HARDWARE; VOLTAGE INPUT COMPUTER HARDWARE; ICP SENSOR ADAPTER MODULES, ALL FOR USE IN TESTING OF BOATS AND UNDERWATER TESTING; OPTICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, OPTICAL TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, DATA LINKS, AND TRANSCEIVERS; MEASURING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR MEASURING FREQUENCY, TEMPERATURE, VOLTAGE, CURRENT, STRAIN GAUGE, COUNTER FUNCTIONS, BUS DATA, AND CONTROLLER AREA NETWORK BUS DATA; SIGNALING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, CABLES FOR ELECTRICAL AND OPTICAL SIGNAL TRANSMISSION; DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ENGINEERING SERVICES AND SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF VEHICLE TESTING | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 10, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 19, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |