Drawing for RO? KOMPAKT

USPTO serial 79014055

RO? KOMPAKT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3159040Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RO? KOMPAKT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CECELIA M. PERRY

CECELIA M PERRY SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW & TUTTLE PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Bags, namely, handbags, ruck sacks, travelling bags, valises, document wallets, pursesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
025Ready-made clothing, namely, jackets, coats, trousers, shirts, skirts, sweaters, hats, gloves, plain knitted jackets; jackets, coats, and trousers made of leather or imitation leather; belts, shoes, hosiery and undergarments, all for men, women and childrenSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 16, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Oct 16, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 15, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 16, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 23, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance