USPTO serial 79014091
CONFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3202299Status 707Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2007
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- —
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CONFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Pierce
Robert S. Pierce Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC400 7th St., NW, Ste. 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for manufacturing concrete; [ modular systems for manufacturing concrete comprising concrete mixer, process controller, aggregate compartments, silo, control cabin, service platform, lighting, and/or automatic mixer washing system; equipment for the manufacture and mixing of concrete, namely, silos and high pressure washing heads; concrete mixers; concrete construction machines; concrete finishing machines; concrete paving machines; concrete placing machines; concrete vibrators, including motor vibrators, mechanical and electromechanical vibrators for industrial use and their controls; vibration machines for industrial use for shaking, feeding, screening, compacting, and classifying bulk solids or liquid/solid mixtures; feeding machinery, namely, mechanized feeders for use in adding sand, gravel, water, aggregate and cement to concrete manufacturing machines; ] heavy machinery for use in the transportation and distribution of concrete, namely, conveyors [ electric motors for machines, not for land vehicles; couplings for machines; transmission belts for machines, not for land vehicles, and parts therefor ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Dosimeters; weighing, measuring, signaling, and checking apparatus and instruments for the building industry, namely, moisture meters, instruments for proportioning and weighing concrete and concrete admixture ingredients, namely, scales and balances; electrical apparatus and instruments in the form of electrical control systems comprised of electronic controllers, liquid flow controls, liquid level controls, electronic water flow controls, electronic sensors, electronic control panels, electronic motor controls, safety valves for automatic flow shut-off, and safety valves for automatic system shut-off, all for machines for use in the manufacture of concrete, for automated control of concrete plant operations and concrete production equipment and for automated self-washing of concrete production plants and equipment ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | [ Building construction and repair; installation of concrete plants, [ cleaning systems, ] silo systems, and vibrations systems ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SKAKO Concrete A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Skako A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Skako A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Skako A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named CONFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |