USPTO serial 79014097
ZUBA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZUBA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit drinks, fruit juices, sorbets, smoothies, syrups and other preparations for making beverages, non-alcoholic beverages, mineral waters, health drinks (in the opinion of the International Bureau, the specified term is too vague for the purposes of classification - Rule 13(2) (b) of the Common Regulations), soft drinks, beers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages (other than beers), designer alcoholic drinks (in the opinion of the International Bureau, the specified terms are too vague for the purposes of classification - Rule 13(2) (b) of the Common Regulations), alcoholic fruit drinks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail sale of fruit drinks, food, alcoholic beverages, non-alcoholic beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Mobile phone services, telecommunications services, Internet services, Internet service provider services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Providing food and drink; providing hotel, resort and temporary accommodation | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Food Evolution Pty Ltd ACN 107 710 243
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named ZUBA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |