Drawing for RAS

USPTO serial 79014118

RAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Installations for supplying and distributing water, as well as their components and replacement parts (included in this class); stream regulators and flow limiting valves, spray controller valves equipped with airing, showers, components and replacement parts for showers; sanitary installations, components and replacement parts for sanitary installations; taps for sanitary installationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 9, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance