Drawing for BRAND VAN EGMOND

USPTO serial 79014119

BRAND VAN EGMOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAND VAN EGMOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus and installations for lighting; light fittings such as (contact) rails for lights; fluorescent light tubes; lamps; light bulbs; incandescent filaments; electric discharge tubes for lighting; lamp chimneys; lampshades; reflectors for lighting and light installations; flashlights; hanging systems for lighting, light apparatus and installations; parts of the aforementioned goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Scientific and technical services and research and design relating thereto and in relation to lighting and interior design; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; providing of software for the simulation of the use of lighting, amongst others by means of the InternetSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 26, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 21, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 21, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 25, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 17, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 22, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Dec 21, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 28, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Oct 26, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 26, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 24, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance