Drawing for HIMALAYA

USPTO serial 79014142

HIMALAYA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIMALAYA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Tobacco, raw and processed; tobacco products, primarily cigarettes, cigars, cigarillos; smoking tobacco; smokers' articles; pipes, pipe filters, pipe cleaners, pipe stands, pipe ashtrays, pipe stems and pipe tools (not made of precious metal); moisture-retaining containers for tobacco products; cigarette papers; apparatus for rolling your own cigarettes; cigarette sleeves; cigarette sleeve fillers; matches; filter tips; tobacco pouches; ignition apparatus and flints for cigarette lighters; cartons and pouches for cigars, cigarettes, pipes, snuff and tobacco; ashtrays (not made of precious metal); herbs for smoking; tobacco tins (not made of precious metal or coated therewith); cigar cutters; gas cartridges for cigarette lighters; pocket lighters (not made of precious metal of coated therewith); smokers' cases; snuff; snuff takers articles, snuff dispensers (not made of precious metal or coated therewith); chewing tobacco; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods, included in this classSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 23, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 1, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 8, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 21, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance