Drawing for ESSENTA

USPTO serial 79014165

ESSENTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194405Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESSENTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward W. Goodman, Edward Blocker, David L. Barnes, Robert J. Kraus, Michael E. Marion, Jack E. Haken

EDWARD W GOODMAN PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N AMERICA CORPPO BOX 3001BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric apparatus and instruments for recording, processing, analyzing and reproducing medical and patient related data; pre-recorded computer software programs used to store, analyze, process medical and patient related data for use in the medical field; computer network interface software used to facilitate documentation, storage, and analysis of patients` healthcare records for use in the medical fieldSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Medical and surgical apparatus, instruments and scanners, namely, MRI diagnostic apparatus, ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus, electromagnetic medical diagnostic imaging apparatus, medical diagnostic fluoroscopy apparatusSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 17, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 1, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance