USPTO serial 79014168
VINEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3247694Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 29, 2007
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VINEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hae Park-Suk
Hae Park-Suk Barnes & Thornburg LLP1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWSuite 500Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Centrifuges, namely, separators and decanters for wine and fruit juice processing and producing, and said machines in modular design; Equipment and accessories therefor, namely, bowls, conveyors, drives, shafts, discs, weirs, housings, gear units, scrolls, feed tubes, centripedal pumps; Controlling devices for said machines equipment and accessories, namely, motors, hydromotors, pump units, customizable drive systems, for operating mechanical centrifuges, namely, separators and decanters as well as plants for the processing and producing of wine | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic controlling devices, namely, motors, customizable drives and computerized controls for operating mechanical centrifuges, namely, separators and decanters as well as plants for the processing and producing of wine | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of juice from grapes and other fruits, processing of grapes or others fruits, conservation of beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WESTFALIA SEPARATOR AG
- Other trademarks owned by WESTFALIA SEPARATOR AG
- Other trademarks owned by WESTFALIA SEPARATOR AG
- Other trademarks owned by GEA Mechanical Equipment GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named VINEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |