Drawing for HARVINEX

USPTO serial 79014169

HARVINEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3174314Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2006
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARVINEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HAE PARK-SUK

Hae Park-Suk Barnes & Thornburg LLP1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWSuite 500Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Agricultural machines, namely, separators and decanters for wine and fruit juice processing and producing, and said machines in modular design; and equipment for said machines, namely, bowls, conveyors, drives, shafts, discs, weirs, housings, gear units, scrolls, feed tubes, centripedal pumps; Controlling devices for said machines equipment and accessories, namely, motors, hydromotors, pump units, customizable drive systems, for operating mechanical centrifuges, namely, separators and decanters as well as plants for the processing and producing of wineSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Electronic controlling devices for operating mechanical centrifuges, especially for separators and decanters as well as plants for the processing and producing of wineSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
012Land vehicles for harvestingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 27, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 17, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Oct 4, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 28, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 2, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 2, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 15, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 14, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 16, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance