Drawing for Serial No. 79014187

USPTO serial 79014187

Serial No. 79014187

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79014187?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adrienne L. White

ADRIENNE L WHITE WRB-IP LLP1217 KING STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Brandy and CognacABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 5, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 25, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 2, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 1, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 11, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 26, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 22, 2006OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2006OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Dec 21, 2006OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance