USPTO serial 79014189
SHAKEAWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3318398Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2007
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHAKEAWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GB
Peter Robert Moody & Robert Peter Hazell
Bournemouth, Dorset BH1 1BB, GB
Other trademarks owned by Peter Robert Moody & Robert Peter Hazell
Peter Robert Moody & Robert Peter Hazell
Bournemouth, Dorset BH1 1BB, GB
Other trademarks owned by Peter Robert Moody & Robert Peter Hazell
Peter Robert Moody & Robert Peter Hazell
Bournemouth, Dorset BH1 1BB, GB
Other trademarks owned by Peter Robert Moody & Robert Peter Hazell
GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry or game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, cranberry sauces, and apple sauces; eggs, milk; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yoghurt and milk products; edible oils and fats | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shakeaway Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Robert Moody & Robert Peter Hazell
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Robert Moody & Robert Peter Hazell
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Robert Moody & Robert Peter Hazell
- Other trademarks owned by ShakeAway Worldwide Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named SHAKEAWAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |