Drawing for TERRE DI BÒ

USPTO serial 79014294

TERRE DI BÒ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3225256Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 3, 2007
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with TERRE DI BÒ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin A. Thompson

Kevin A. Thompson LADAS & PARRY LLP224 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUESUITE #1600CHICAGO, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ jellies, jams, compotes edible oils, olive oils, sunflower oils, corn oils, peanut oils, potato crisps and fried potatoes ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
030[ cakes, biscuits, plum cakes, cereal-based snack foods, and sweets, namely, candies ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
032[ Beers; mineral and aerated waters; and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, soft drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups, concentrates, and powders for making beverages ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, red wine, white wine and sparkling wineACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 6, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 20, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Jan 20, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 20, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 20, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 15, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 16, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 3, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 11, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Apr 16, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 9, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 9, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 29, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 15, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 15, 2012C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 15, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 5, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Apr 5, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 5, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 1, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 1, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 29, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance