Drawing for MIER

USPTO serial 79014308

MIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3177262Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 2006
Examiner
EVANS, ANDREA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith Swedo

Keith Swedo Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP10 W. Market St.Suite 2700Indianapolis, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Transposers, transmitters and transposers of isofrequency for analogue and digital television; mobile phone communication repeaters; receiving and transmitting antennas; filters, signal dividers, power distributors and multiplexers for telecommunications; equipment for satellite payloads and for earth satellites, particularly solid-state power amplifiers, low noise amplifiers, down converters, front-end converters and local oscillatorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 8, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 6, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 9, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 28, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 30, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 28, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 27, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 21, 2012NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED
Jun 21, 201215AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED
Jun 21, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 21, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 17, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2012E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED
Mar 18, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 2, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 31, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance