Drawing for POWERVISION

USPTO serial 79014310

POWERVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3740108Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 19, 2010
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Agricultural sorting and selection systems comprised of computer hardware, computer software, and camerasSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 27, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 19, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 14, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 2, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 15, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Sep 12, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 25, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 23, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 21, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 8, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 25, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 2, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 21, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance