Drawing for BALSAMISSIMO

USPTO serial 79014353

BALSAMISSIMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BALSAMISSIMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Salt; mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments), spicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 31, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 7, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 17, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Nov 25, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Nov 25, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Oct 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 11, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 11, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance