Drawing for THIOPLAST

USPTO serial 79014367

THIOPLAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3202306Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 23, 2007
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with THIOPLAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah Henscheid

Deborah Henscheid Lorenz & Kopf, LLP7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd., Ste. 200Scottsdale, AZ 85253UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in the manufacture of sealants and coatingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 27, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 30, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 23, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 23, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 27, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 27, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 31, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 31, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 27, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 20, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance