Drawing for AURELLE

USPTO serial 79014400

AURELLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3218181Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 13, 2007
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AURELLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Barnes, Edward W. Goodman, Michael E. Marion, Jack E. Haken

EDWARD W GOODMAN PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N AMERICA CORPPO BOX 3001BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Control apparatus for lighting systems, namely, remote controls for lighting systems, electronic controls and adapters for lighting systems; electronic ballasts for lighting purposes; light emitting diodes; laser diodes and zener diodesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
011Electric lamps and lighting fixtures; lighting fixtures, namely, light emitting diode (LED) deck lights, rechargeable electric LED candles and low voltage LED accent lights; parts of the aforesaid goods, namely, lamps shadesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 9, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 4, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jan 4, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 18, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 18, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 18, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 18, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance