USPTO serial 79014416
GERDA SPILLMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3213598Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 27, 2007
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GERDA SPILLMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETIC PREPARATIONS, NAMELY CLEANSING CREAMS, CLEANSING MILK AND CLEANSING OILS, SKIN CREAMS, SKIN TONICS, SKIN LOTIONS, SKIN EMOLLIENTS, BODY LOTIONS, SKIN MASKS, MASSAGE OILS, PROTECTIVE CREAMS FOR THE SKIN, NAMELY SKIN MOISTURIZERS, SKIN SUNSCREENS, SKIN CREAMS, AND FACE CREAMS, MAKE-UP BASE AND FOUNDATIONS, FACE POWDERS, EYE REGION CREAMS, NAMELY SKIN CREAMS AND LOTIONS FOR THE EYES; FACIAL COSMETIC PREPARATIONS, NAMELY CREAMS, OILS AND LOTIONS FOR THE CARE OF THE FACE; SKIN WHITENING CREAMS, SKIN MILK AND SUN TANNING AND AFTER-SUN LOTIONS AND CREAMS; SKIN LOTIONS, NAMELY CREAMS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |