Drawing for DATATRACEDNA

USPTO serial 79014457

DATATRACEDNA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3312714Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 16, 2007
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATATRACEDNA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie P. Kramer

Leslie P. Kramer Faegre Baker Daniels LLP1700 Lincoln Street3200 Wells Fargo CenterDENVER, CO 80203-4532

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Transponders; security tagging system, namely an identification system comprised of security adhesives, namely stickers and discs containing' encoded security data suspended in an adhesive solution, and security markers, namely, discs, labels and threads containing encoded security data that can be attached to any type of good for identification purposes, and reading devices containing magnifying lenses and ultraviolet lights to read the encoded data stored on such security adhesives and security markers;information and retrieval computer systems, namely, computer software for accessing,creating and maintaining an electronic database containing information in the field of security dataSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 19, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 16, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 19, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 19, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 5, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 31, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance