Drawing for DATATRACEDNA

USPTO serial 79014457

DATATRACEDNA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3312714Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 16, 2007
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATATRACEDNA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie P. Kramer

Leslie P. Kramer Faegre Baker Daniels LLP1700 Lincoln Street3200 Wells Fargo CenterDENVER, CO 80203-4532

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Transponders; security tagging system, namely an identification system comprised of security adhesives, namely stickers and discs containing' encoded security data suspended in an adhesive solution, and security markers, namely, discs, labels and threads containing encoded security data that can be attached to any type of good for identification purposes, and reading devices containing magnifying lenses and ultraviolet lights to read the encoded data stored on such security adhesives and security markers;information and retrieval computer systems, namely, computer software for accessing,creating and maintaining an electronic database containing information in the field of security dataSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Mar 5, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 19, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 19, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Oct 16, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 19, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Apr 19, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Apr 19, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Apr 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 5, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 24, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 24, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 16, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 31, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 4, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance