USPTO serial 79014837
ONETENNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3168931Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2006
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONETENNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic resonance tags, labels and cards, with embedded resonance circuits, microchips, computer memories, radio frequency and electronic readable data carriers containing identification information for use in security and identification verification applications; and electronic data reading and data recording apparatus and instruments, namely, bar code readers and electronic readers for reading electronic resonance cards, tags, and labels for use in security and identification verification and other applications, in this class | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Paper for packaging, cardboard, labels, tags and cards supplied in reels and sheets with adhesive or silicon liner | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMARTRAC IP B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by UPM Raflatac Oy
- Other trademarks owned by UPM Raflatac Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Raflatac Oy
- Other trademarks owned by Raflatac Oy
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named ONETENNA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 3, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |