Drawing for MILIEU

USPTO serial 79014856

MILIEU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILIEU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing namely jackets, coats, overcoats, raincoats, parkas, blousons, waistcoats, suits, skirts, trousers, pants, breeches, hats, caps, gloves, socks, stockings, shawls, scarves, knitwear namely pullovers, vests, camisoles, dresses for women, tee-shirts, shirts, sweaters, cardigans, blouses and underwear; footwear, namely casual and sporting shoes, boots, slippers and sandals; hatsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 6, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 22, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 31, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 26, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 17, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance