Drawing for IGEL

USPTO serial 79014875

IGEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3095911Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 23, 2006
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with IGEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,700

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Spoor Gard

Julia Spoor Gard Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processors; central processing units for processing data; computer chip set for use in processing data to and from a central processing unit; interface cards for data processing equipment in the form of printed circuits; computer software for application and database integration; network access server operating software; computer software for ensuring the secure access to local area networks; and computer software for the administration of computer local area networks and the detection of computer security virus threatsACTIVE
042Scientific and technological research and design for others in the field of electronic data processing; technical research and consultation in the field of industrial computer operating systems; and design and development of computer hardware and software for multimedia productsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 29, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 26, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 22, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 23, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 27, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 19, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 22, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 22, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 10, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Jun 10, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Jun 10, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 22, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 19, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 23, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 9, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 15, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 15, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 15, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Jun 15, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 30, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Oct 22, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 7, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 1, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 1, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 24, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 23, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 11, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 26, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance