Drawing for Serial No. 79014934

USPTO serial 79014934

Serial No. 79014934

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3283174Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2007
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79014934?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Oliff

James A. Oliff Oliff & Berridge, PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, jeans, t-shirts, polo shirts, sweat shirts, sweaters, gloves and socks; belts for clothing; footwear, namely, sports shoes, mountaineering boots and sandals; headgear for wear, namely, caps and hatsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 26, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jun 19, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 21, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 21, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 6, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 11, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 21, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 2, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
May 9, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 23, 2007CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 15, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance