USPTO serial 79014965
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
85748 Garching, DE
85748 Garching, DE
85748 Garching, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Kenney
Robert J. Kenney BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, using solder bumping technology, for use in the manufacture of semi-conductors and microstructure elements such as wafers and glass templates used in the manufacture of semi-conductors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software for use in the manufacture of semi-conductors and microstructure elements such as wafers and glass templates used in the manufacture of semi-conductors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Maintenance, repair and installation of machines for the manufacture of semi-conductors and microstructure elements such as wafers and glass templates used in the manufacture of semi-conductors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |