Drawing for SAKEBABY

USPTO serial 79014977

SAKEBABY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3184021Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2006
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAKEBABY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

Gary D. Krugman Sughrue Mion, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, SAKE, WINE, LIQUORS, AND ALCOHOLIC PUNCHSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 27, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 9, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 5, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 5, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance