Drawing for CANDIDAS

USPTO serial 79015035

CANDIDAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FISHER, LATONIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANDIDAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical foils and films as part of optical apparatus, of electronic apparatus included in this class, of vending machines, of automatic telling machines; optical foils and films as part of lighting apparatus and installationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
011Diffusers (lighting)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED
017Plastic films and sheets other than for packaging (finished and semi-finished)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 21, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 2, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 21, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 22, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 11, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance