Drawing for RODISC

USPTO serial 79015038

RODISC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3154348Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 10, 2006
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with RODISC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Bagarazzi

James M. Bagarazzi DORITY & MANNING, P.A.P.O. BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for separating solids from liquids; mechanical separators for separating solids from liquids; machines for screening and/or filtering of liquids as far as contained in this classACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Aug 24, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Aug 10, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 12, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 31, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 8, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 8, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 8, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 26, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 15, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Oct 15, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Oct 15, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 5, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Oct 5, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 21, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 4, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 18, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 18, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance