USPTO serial 79015040
KAHUNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3247699Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 29, 2007
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAHUNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video, audio and image signal processing apparatus namely, signal testers, monitors, converters, processors, encoders, decoders, signal generators, analyzers, video tape players, screen optimizers, noise reducers, switchers, routers, correctors, synchronizers, amplifiers, serializers and deserializers, digital video effects processors; video, audio and image signal processing apparatus and software for reading, writing, decoding, extracting, encoding or injection of metadata information into files or multi-media signals; electronic apparatus for use in the capture, production, post-production, conversion, recording, retrieval, distribution, play out and broadcast of television material, namely, antennas, transmitters, encoders, decoders, receivers, amplifiers, converters, monitors, modulators and demodulators, mixers, equalizers, signal generators, synchronizers, time-based correctors, color correctors, noise reducers, test pattern generators, signal compression apparatus, oscillators and filters; video communications apparatus, namely, video signal processors, video processors, video recorders, and video reproduction equipment, namely, video cameras, televisions and video monitors; audio and video apparatus for domestic use, namely, television receivers, televisions, video monitors, video players, video displays, video display optimizers, DVD players and CD players; display processing apparatus, namely, video signal converters for the purpose of display in a television; software for the purpose of converting video signals to display in a television; television standards converters; apparatus for the transfer of film material to video; apparatus and software for use in film post production; apparatus and software for the generation, storage, modification and playing of test patterns and test signals; amplifiers, buffers, distributors, routers, switchers, mixers, serializers, deserializers, analyzers, monitors, standards converters, up-converters, down-converters, cross-converters, aspect-ratio-converters, editors, converters, time base correctors, synchronisers, color encoders, color decoders, color correctors, translators, pre-processors, post-processors, multiplexers, de-multiplexers, apparatus for storing picture, video or audio information, audio inserters, audio extractors, recorders and noise reducers, all for use with video, picture or audio signals, whether compressed, partially compressed or uncompressed; apparatus and software for compression encoding, compression decoding, transcoding, partial encoding or partial decoding of picture, video or audio signals; apparatus and software for the generation of digital effects in film or video; apparatus and software for use in the removal of artefacts from film or video; apparatus for the restoration of film and video archives and for the management and retrieval of film and video archives; apparatus and software for testing, analyzing, monitoring, guiding or controlling any of the foregoing, namely, apparatus and software for sharing and contributing metadata in a collaborative workgroup, apparatus and software to perform file management, conversion and translation, apparatus and software to edit, conform and perform a list of edits or effects from an imported metadata file to resulting files or multimedia signals; computer software for audio visual applications, namely control and processing software for audio visual applications; integrated circuits, circuit boards, spare parts or sub-assemblies for use with any of the foregoing apparatus | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Snell Limited
- Other trademarks owned by SNELL & WILCOX LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SNELL & WILCOX LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SNELL & WILCOX LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named KAHUNET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |