USPTO serial 79015089
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer K. Ziegler
Jennifer K. Ziegler Brooks Kushman P.C.1000 Town Center22nd FloorSouthfield, MI 48075| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific filtration equipment, namely, laboratory filters for use in ultrafiltration, diafiltration, microfiltration or reverse osmosis | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |