Drawing for UF-PHT

USPTO serial 79015089

UF-PHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3462410Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 8, 2008
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with UF-PHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer K. Ziegler

Jennifer K. Ziegler Brooks Kushman P.C.1000 Town Center22nd FloorSouthfield, MI 48075

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific filtration equipment, namely, laboratory filters for use in ultrafiltration, diafiltration, microfiltration or reverse osmosisACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 25, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 2, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 2, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 26, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 23, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 18, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Jul 18, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jul 17, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 2, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 2, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 23, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 8, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 22, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 22, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 22, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 6, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Dec 13, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Dec 4, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Nov 23, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 8, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 8, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 8, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 30, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance