Drawing for LE ROULÉ

USPTO serial 79015241

LE ROULÉ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3213605Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 27, 2007
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LE ROULÉ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Brooke

THOMAS W BROOKE HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP800 17th Street NWSuite 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029cheese, milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; cream, yogurt, butter, milkSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 11, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 22, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 23, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 23, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 12, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Sep 10, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 14, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Mar 14, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 7, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Feb 7, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 7, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 20, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Nov 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 11, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance