USPTO serial 79015244
EVOLVIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3174326Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 2006
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVOLVIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric motors and motor reducers both for operating blinds, shielding elements, namely screens, curtains, shutters, windows, ventilation hatches, locks, doors, garage doors, gates, barriers and grills, namely railings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments, namely switches and remote controls to operate and control the operating motors for blinds, screens, curtains, shutters, windows,ventilation, hatches, locks, doors, garage doors, gates, barriers and railings; electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments namely switches and remote controls to operate and control lighting apparatus; electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments for surveillance and alarm purposes, namely electrical and electronic burglar and fire alarms, switches and remote controls therefore for the protection of buildings and persons and goods therein | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |