Drawing for MK

USPTO serial 79015278

MK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal flanges and collars, metal chimneys, metal ducts for ventilating and air conditioning installations, transportable metal constructions, metal tanks, metal piping, metal branching pipesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
011Air filtering and conditioning installationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
037Chimney installation, heating equipment installation and repair, furnace installation and repairSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Feb 27, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 2, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 9, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 5, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance