Drawing for M-TECH

USPTO serial 79015328

M-TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3196967Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 9, 2007
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with M-TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nils H. Ljungman

Nils H. Ljungman NILS H LJUNGMAN & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 130GREENSBURG, PA 15601-0130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Sheets, plates, foils and strips of metal, all for use in the manufacture of metal sheets and foils for reduction of assembly tolerances, finished metal blanks, metal foil tape, stamped and deep-drawn parts and assemblies for use in the printing machine industries, the automobile industries, the manufacturing industries, and the aircraft industries; shims of laminated metal foils, aluminum, brass, cold-rolled strip steel, and stainless steel; metal shims; grommets of laminated metal foils, aluminum, brass, cold-rolled strip steel, and stainless steel; plates of laminated metal foils, aluminum, brass, cold-rolled strip steel, and stainless steel for use in the printing machine industries, automobile industries, the manufacturing industries, and the aircraft industries; metal spacer brackets; layered sheets of metal, namely, shims for reduction of assembly tolerances; layered sheets of laminated metal foils or metal sheets, namely, shims for reduction of assembly tolerances; metal adaptor rings for ball bearings; metal slide rails for electrical machines; layered metal, metal foil strips and metal foils for mounting, including self-adhesive metal foil strips and metal foils for mounting; metal foils and sheets produced by die cutting for use in the manufacture of metal sheets and foils for reduction of assembly tolerances, finished metal blanks, metal foil tape, stamped and deep-drawn parts and assemblies for use in the printing machine industries, automobile industries, the manufacturing industries, and the aircraft industries; and metal gaskets for use in the printing machine industry, the automobile industry, and the aircraft industryACTIVE—
017Plates, foils, gaskets and strips of plastic or rubber for use in the manufacture of plastic or rubber sheets and foils for reduction of assembly tolerances, finished plastic or rubber blanks, plastic or rubber foil tape, stamped and deep-drawn parts and assemblies for use in the printing machine industries, the automobile industries, the manufacturing industries, and the aircraft industries; spacer brackets of plastic or rubber; layered sheets of plastic or rubber for reduction of assembly tolerances, namely, shims; layered sheets of plastic foils or plastic sheets for reduction of assembly tolerances, namely, shims; adaptor rings of plastic or rubber for ball bearings; layered plastic, plastic foil strips and plastic foils for mounting, including self-adhesive foil strips and foils of plastic for mounting; all the aforementioned goods not for use in the textile industry nor for packingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 8, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
May 8, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 8, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 20, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Dec 14, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 14, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 20, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance