Drawing for ACRYLAWAY

USPTO serial 79015366

ACRYLAWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3206379Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 6, 2007
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ACRYLAWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vincent O. Wagner

Vincent O. Wagner Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP111 Monument CircleSuite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Enzyme preparations for use in the food industryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 17, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 20, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 14, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 13, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 30, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 27, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 22, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 3, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 10, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Feb 14, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Feb 14, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 6, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Feb 6, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 28, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 28, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 19, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance