Drawing for TRESPA SURFACE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79015382

TRESPA SURFACE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3209330Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 13, 2007
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRESPA SURFACE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence H. Binderow, Attorney at Law

LAWRENCE H BINDEROW, ATTORNEY AT LAW BINDEROW LAW OFFICES1330 CAMINO DEL MAR STE 250DEL MAR, CA 92014UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Semi-finished and finished thermoplastic products, excluding flexible tubing, hoses, and clips therefore and excluding package banding strips, namely decoration foils, boards, and laminates for use in wall boards for wall panelling, facades, wash rooms, sanitary and other damp rooms, decorative panels, worktops, and partitions used in furnitureSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
019Non-metal boards, namely, wall boards for wall panelling, facades, wash rooms, sanitary and other damp rooms, boards for panelling balconies, doors, ceiling and floorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
020Boards, namely decorative panels, worktops and partitions used in furnitureSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 29, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Oct 29, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 5, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 23, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 30, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 30, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 24, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 21, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 6, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 21, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance