Drawing for BATTLEFIELD SPECIAL FORCES 2

USPTO serial 79015418

BATTLEFIELD SPECIAL FORCES 2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3145733Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 19, 2006
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BATTLEFIELD SPECIAL FORCES 2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kerry Hopkins

EA DIGITAL ILLUSIONS CE ABKatarinvagen 15Stockholm,SWEDEN

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game programsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 19, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 22, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 6, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 5, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 30, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 31, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 22, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 17, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 1, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 28, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 12, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 19, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 27, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance