Drawing for KETTENWULF

USPTO serial 79015452

KETTENWULF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KETTENWULF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Conveyor chains, driving chains and chain wheels (except for agricultural vehicles)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Conveyor chains, driving chains and chain wheels for agricultural vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 18, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 13, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 13, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance