Drawing for HANDS!UP

USPTO serial 79015494

HANDS!UP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HANDS!UP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003nail care preparations and hand care preparations namely lotions, creams and moisturizersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 30, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 12, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 9, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 29, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance