USPTO serial 79015508
MAX DE CARLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAX DE CARLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-56020 S. Romano-Montopoli in V/A-PI, IT
I-56020 S. Romano-Montopoli in V/A-PI, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
Donald L. Dennison Dennison, Schultz & MacDonald1727 King StreetSuite 105Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear, excluding clothing and head wear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |