USPTO serial 79015553
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations; sanitary preparations for medical purposes; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, food for babies; plasters, materials for dressings; material for stopping teeth, dental wax; disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |