Drawing for DM MERLET

USPTO serial 79015630

DM MERLET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3202328Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 23, 2007
Examiner
HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with DM MERLET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel P. Mullarkey

Daniel P. Mullarkey Polsinelli PC1401 Eye Street, NW, Suite 800Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, wines; liqueurs; distilled spirits; aperitifs; digestifs; prepared alcoholic cocktails containing fruit; prepared wine cocktails containing fruit; Pineau; and distilled spirits, namely, liqueurs, vodka, Cognac and brandyACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 29, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 12, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 22, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 9, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 9, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 8, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 9, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 6, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Feb 6, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Feb 6, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 23, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 22, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 22, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Sep 22, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Sep 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 23, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 20, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance