Drawing for SCARLET

USPTO serial 79015643

SCARLET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCARLET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Gymnastic and sporting articles, namely snow skis, ski blindings, ski polesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 25, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 7, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 1, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 30, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 17, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2006MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Dec 15, 2006ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jul 20, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 19, 2006NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
May 18, 2006NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
May 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance