Drawing for ARIX AUTO-ARRAY SYSTEM

USPTO serial 79015687

ARIX AUTO-ARRAY SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3130145Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARIX AUTO-ARRAY SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PHOUPHANOMKETH DITTHAVONG

PHOUPHANOMKETH DITTHAVONG DITTHAVONG MORI & STEINER, P.C.44 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 322ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008MANUAL DRILLS; MANUAL DRILL SCREW BITS; MANUAL DRILL BITS; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, MANUALLY OPERATED SHARPENING WHEELS, MANUALLY OPERATED DIAMOND WHEELS; MANUALLY OPERATED WIRE SAWS; SHARPENING STONES; DIAMOND TOOLS, NAMELY, MANUALLY OPERATED DIAMOND SANDERS, MANUALLY OPERATED PAD CONDITIONING DIAMOND SANDERS FOR CHEMICAL AND MECHANICAL POLISHING; DIAMOND GRINDING WHEELS, NAMELY, MANUALLY OPERATED WAFER BACK GRINDING DIAMOND WHEELS, MANUALLY OPERATED WAFER EDGE GRINDING DIAMOND WHEELS, MANUALLY OPERATED GLASS EDGE GRINDING DIAMOND WHEELSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 18, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 17, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 4, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance