Drawing for VI TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79015733

VI TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3215964Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 6, 2007
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VI TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith E. Gilman

Keith E. Gilman Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Inspection apparatus, [ and electronic, optical or laser apparatus for repairing electronic goods, namely, electronic cards and wafers; ] Inspection and fault detection software for electronic cards and electronic wafers [ Apparatus for laser soldering and desoldering for the electronics industry ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 26, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 13, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 9, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 9, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 9, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 27, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 23, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 23, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 1, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 1, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
May 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance