Drawing for 55 BLEND FIFTY FIVE VINCENT LATASTE

USPTO serial 79015771

55 BLEND FIFTY FIVE VINCENT LATASTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 55 BLEND FIFTY FIVE VINCENT LATASTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Wright

WILLIAM C WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZEMAN & JAMES LLP60 E 42ND ST RM 820NEW YORK, NY 10165-0820UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 7, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 19, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 16, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 16, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 13, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 12, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 28, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jul 2, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jun 29, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
May 2, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 29, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 13, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 14, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance