USPTO serial 79015829
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
I-00131 ROMA, IT
SELEX Sistemi Integrati S.p.A.
I-00131 Roma, IT
SELEX Sistemi Integrati S.p.A.
I-00131 Roma, IT
SELEX Sistemi Integrati S.p.A.
I-00131 Roma, IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BLDGONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radars; nano optical radars; electronic, pressure, temperature, chemical, magnetic, position, geodetical, vibrational, optical, atomic and molecular spectroscopes, and MEMS sensors based on nanotechnologies for use in and with fuel cells, X-ray analysis systems for non-medical applications, automotive applications, aerospace applications, drugs detection, explosives detection, illegal immigration systems, imaging analysis, monitoring of manufacturing processes, including semiconductors and vacuum coating, rail industry monitoring, metrology systems, position definition systems, mechatronics applications, navigation systems, microwave radiometers and altimeters, phased array radars, synthetic aperture radars, real aperture radars, weapons systems, homeland protection systems, missiles systems of all types, torpedo systems of all types, satellites systems, airplanes and helicopters; electronic, pressure, temperature, chemical, magnetic, position, geodetical, vibrational, atomic and molecular spectroscopes, and MEMS sensors based on photonics for use in and with X-ray analysis systems for non-medical applications, automotive applications, aerospace applications, drugs detection, explosives detection, illegal immigration systems, imaging analysis, monitoring of manufacturing processes, including semiconductors and vacuum coating, rail industry monitoring, metrology systems, position definition systems, mechatronics applications, navigation systems, microwave radiometers and altimeters, phased array radars, synthetic aperture radars, real aperture radars, weapons systems, homeland protection systems, missiles systems of all types, torpedo systems of all types, satellites systems, airplanes and helicopters | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, educational presentations held at a variety of locations and seminars conducted over the internet, in the field of devices and systems supporting nano technologies and photonics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological research in the field of nanotechnologies and photonics; research, design and development of hardware and software used in the field of nanotechnologies and photonics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |